Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis
Many ways to operate
Surgeons can rely on the consistent 1mm thickness of Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis, available in three configurations — non-perforated, perforated, and pre-shaped — to suit a range of surgical needs in shape and size.

One thickness, three unique options

With precise thickness consistency, Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis provides a predictable option for excellent handling.1,2,3,6,
A novel configuration in Evergen's Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis portfolio featuring a distinctive pattern of hexagonal perforations.
Cortiva® 1mm Tailored allograft dermis is designed to enhance surgical precision and support patient-centric customization.11
Each graft features a uniform 1mm thickness with tight specification tolerances, ensuring consistent, predictable handling and optimal pliability and conformability.1

Level 1 clinical evidence

In a prospective randomized controlled trial of 302 patients, outcomes with Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis (151 patients) were compared to outcomes with AlloDerm RTM (151 patients). The study noted that the odds of seroma formation were almost 2-fold higher with AlloDerm RTM than with Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis (p=0.047) after adjustment for relevant covariates.2,
« SCROLL »

3-6x faster fluid drainage with unique perforated design

A modified Franz cell test comparing how long it took for 500 mL of fluid to pass through 6-by-6-centimeter samples of Cortiva® 1mm Perforated allograft dermis, FlexHD Pliable Perforated, Thin, and AlloDerm RTM Perforated shows a 3-6x times faster drainage rate with Cortiva® 1mm Perforated allograft dermis.1

Drainage time per 500ml

Cortiva® 1mm
Perforated allograft dermis
25 sec
FlexHD Pliable
Perforated, Thin
93 sec
AlloDerm RTM
Perforated
152 sec
Lab data may not be representative of effects or performance in humans.

Rapid revascularization

Pre-clinical results1,*
(100x)

In pre-clinical studies of cellular infiltration and histology, capillary formation was observed as early as 7 days post implantation along with a favorable immune response consistent with normal wound healing.1,*

Clinical results3,†
(100x)

In a clinical setting, 13 patients underwent a second planned procedure where the graft
was biopsied, and robust revascularization and incorporation were observed.3,
Images: Representative Masson’s Trichrome

Surgical graft options

With precise thickness consistency and multiple sizes to choose from, Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis provides a predictable option for excellent handling.1,2,3,6,

Thickness

0.8-1.0mm

Rehydration time

At least 30 seconds

Tolerance

+/- 0.1mm

Size options

4 x 12cm to 16 x 20cm

Dermal cut

Dermis without basement membrane

Cortiva® 1mm allograft dermis
DH2412
4 x 12cm
DH2416
4 x 16cm
DH2508
5 x 8cm
DH2612
6 x 12cm
DH2616
6 x 16cm
DH2710
7 x 10cm
DH2812
8 x 12cm
DH2816
8 x 16cm
DH2820
8 x 20cm
DH3015
10 x 15cm
DH3620
16 x 20cm
A novel configuration featuring a distinctive pattern of hexagonal perforations. Hexagonal perforations were shown to give greater multi-directional expansion compared to other perforation shapes.4,*

Thickness

0.8-1.0mm

Rehydration time

At least 30 seconds

Tolerance

+/- 0.1mm

Size options

16 x 20cm

Dermal cut

Dermis without basement membrane

Cortiva® 1mm Perforated allograft dermis
DP1620
16 x 20cm
Designed for a better fit, Cortiva® 1mm Tailored allograft dermis supports greater surgical precision and patient-centric customization.5

Thickness

0.8-1.0mm

Rehydration time

At least 30 seconds

Tolerance

+/- 0.1mm

Size options

7.3 x 15.1cm to 10.2 x21.1cm

Dermal cut

Dermis without basement membrane (no orientation)

Cortiva® 1mm Tailored allograft dermis
DMS087
Small, 7.3 x 15.1cm (87 cm2)
DMM140
Medium, 9.2 x 19.2cm (140cm2)
DML170
Large, 10.2 x 21.1cm (170cm2)

Coordinate implant ordering with your local representative:

800-624-7238

References
  1. Data on file at Evergen.
  2. Keane AM, et al. "Cortiva vs AlloDerm in Prepectoral and Partial Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial." Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 12.
  3. Moyer, et. al. 2017. "A histological comparison of two human acellular dermal matrix products in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, December 2017, 5(12).
  4. Lake, S. et. al., "Pore size and pore shape – but not mesh density – alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair." Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 42(2015) 186-197.
  5. Kanchwala, S. Holton, T. Momeni, A. (2024, February 22). KOL discussion & feedback.
  6. Keifer OP Jr, et al. "A Complication Analysis of 2 Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prosthetic-based Breast Reconstruction." Plast Reconstr Surg GlobOpen. 2016 Jul 13;4(7):e800.
* Performance data from animal models may not be representative of performance in humans.
† Clinical cases are unique and individual results may vary.